Acuario Rosa

Todo lo que rodea a la acuariofilia

Archivos por Etiqueta: Artículos




By Christian Rubilar

There is a very close relationship between fertilizing, uptaking of the fertilizers and algae. The purpose of this work is to explain how these relationships work. This is a complex subject with a lot of new ideas. I will try to be as clear as possible.

The ideas I will explain had been discovered during my work as an aquarium gardener and have been confirmed with positive feedback during the last 5 years at the most important Spanish speaking forum; so this is not speculation. The MCI had over 100,000 reads since it was published and algae is not an issue for us any more. I believe that one of the major issues regarding algae is confusion as to why it occurs or doesn’t occur. If we read about algae in books we can find well known authors assert that some of them bloom because of excess of NO3 or PO4. When I read this I understand that these authors have no idea why algae bloom.

The most popular fertilizing methods don’t provide enough attention to algae. Some of them focus attention on CO2; others assert that to reach the balance will solve the problem. It just doesn’t happen!

On the other hand, the EI method asserts that algae blooms because of lack of CO2, Light or fertilizing. The idea is well oriented, but incomplete. It is empirical evidence. Proper CO2 and light are too basic, so I prefer work with them as prerequisites.

About the lack of nutrients: the EI method asserts that algae blooms because of lack of a nutrient and propose to add this macro/micro to solve the issue. I disagree with this approach. In the following pages I will explain why.


A. Background

Some years ago I was working with a company developing an aquarium fertilizing. When we had the prototype ready, I prepared five extra high light/CO2 planted tanks just to try different combinations of overdosing of this product. I combined it with PO4, KNO3, Fe, etc looking for algae blooms.

I discovered that there is a relationship between certain imbalances and certain algae. On the other hand, when I tried the solution that the EI and other method propose, they just didn’t work.

I also confirmed that when you just add NO3, and let PO4 reach zero then GSA blooms. I discovered that under this water condition, other algae stops blooming or die. I called it the generic KNO3 protocol, which is the main tool we are going to use with the MCI.

B. What exactly is the MCI?

The MCI was born as an algae control method.
I discovered that when CO2 and Light levels are high enough and you have an issue with algae, this is related to an imbalance between nutrients after uptaking.

There are very close relationships between them and it is easy to solve any algae issue when you understand how they work. I use the concept imbalance because talking about excess or lack of is incorrect. When you use the terms excess or lack, you are talking about a macro/micro nutrient without any relationship with nothing more.

Old school asserts that algae blooms because of excess of nutrients, PO4 mainly. The EI asserts that the lack of nutrients is the cause of algae. None of them is entirely wrong. Sometimes it is a lack of and other times it is an excess; depends.

This is not important; the combination of macros/micros we prepare based on the fertilizer bottle, the real important thing is the plant uptake and what is left in water. The fertilizing approach of the MCI uses algae to find out plant uptakes and propose to develop a custom fertilizing for each aquarium.

It is impossible to standardize a fertilizing regime. Light and CO2 are too overestimated, the main variable are the plant combinations. There are some plants with priority uptake of PO4, NO3, Fe, Ca, etc but most of them have no special needs.

For example, glossostigma elatinoides has a priority NO3 uptake. It means that if you don’t add enough KNO3 you will probably have problems with cyano-bacteria. If you have a meadow of marsilea crenata and you don’t add enough PO4 you will have issues with GSA. Anubias and microsorums are PO4 priority consumer plants too.

The idea behind the MCI is that if we have enough CO2 and light we can use the plants as the aquarium filter and we can induce chemistry changes that helps us to have an algae free aquarium at the same time we can have a proper high grow rate. In same cases, for example, an aquarium with discus, we can chose PO4 priority consumer plants like marsilea crenata in order to look for a long term balance.

The MCI starts working with KNO3, low Fe (0.1 ppm), no PO4 or potassium sulfate (K) dosing. This is only a start, algae will tell you if you need to add PO4 and how much. I will explain it properly and in more detail later.

If your fertilizing method is PPS or EI, before you start using the MCI, you should decrease the amount of PO4 and Fe in your water, otherwise, the KNO3 generic protocol will take several weeks to produce PO4 zero and the plants will suffer a lot for lack of micros/Fe, etc.

C. Methodology

The method I propose works only under certain light/water/plants/CO2 conditions. For this reason I will explain it properly and in more detail.

Even when you look for information on algae you can find a lot of possible causes for each of them: excess of water flow, excess of light, etc. I will focus on the key variable: The one that you change so that the problem is solved.

Sometimes the problem is the tap water chemistry. For this reason I will dedicate one chapter to explain the most common issues.

It’s very important that you don’t mix methods and it would be better if you forget all that you know about other fertilizing methods. I found out that some of the knowledge we have is incomplete, wrong or just an improper interpretation of facts or experiments that have arisen in articles and studies on the subject.

I believe that the misunderstanding about algae is related to the use by analogy of hydroponic and terrestrial plant cultivating knowledge. Algae doesn’t exist out of water, so they don’t even have to think about them. Plants are quite flexible about uptaking. No matter which fertilizing method you chose, they will be more or less ok. However, algae can show up and bad theory usually is responsible.

For example, everybody read about the Ca:Mg 4:1 ratio. This is a ratio from terrestrial studies. Under the water this ratio produces several problems. If you add PO4 too, Green Dust Algae will be an issue.

My basic idea is to discover the underwater rules. Usually they are different, so, all the “scientific knowledge” from above the water became useless or problematic.


When there is a balance in the aquarium, plants grow properly and you have no algae. You can reach this goal with any fertilizing method.

Unfortunately we deal with a dynamic balance that involves many factors over which we have more uncertainties than certainties. In this sense I think that the best way to understand our situation is with an analogy: a blind man that moves up the sidewalk with his cane. If this is his first time walking down that path there are few things he can say for sure. The blind man knows that the street is on his right and the wall is on his left. But the fact is that he has no idea about how high the buildings are and it makes no sense to even try to find out. For practical purposes, this person can go blind groping the ground with his cane until he finds the wall on his left and from there he can start walking and reach his destination without getting lost because although he lacks the ability to see, he can use the wall as a guide.

In the aquarium we have a whole series of dynamic variables that we don’t know but, as the blind man, we can choose between the wall and the street. In my opinion, and this is strictly arbitrary, the wall, the safety, are the GSA.

Thus, our target using the ‘Method of Controlled Imbalance’ will not be having Green Spot Algae (GSA) but, instead, generate an equilibrium in which we can predict what will be the possible imbalance we may have. The idea is to generate a water chemistry close to GSA because the correction is as simple and safe for the health and aesthetics of our aquarium.

Even this idea can sound a little weird for you, the fact is that all the fertilizing methods had a tendency to a certain water chemistry but they don’t realize it. The EI, for example, has a tendency to Green Dust (an imbalance related to an improper Ca:Mg ratio plus too much PO4). However, what happens is any unexpected imbalance occurs and other algae blooms. There are some possible answers. Looking for re-establishing the balance as an immediate goal doesn’t work.
Adding more fertilizing doesn’t either.

Following the blind man analogy, we should look for the GSA because when we reach it, we know where we are in the same way that finding the wall with the cane. A GSA friendly water chemistry is a desert for other algae and GSA is easy to remove adding small daily amounts of PO4 (PO4 protocol). The advantages of this methodological approach are manifold. First, like the blind groping the wall, the number of variables at play is endless but those on which we work are extremely limited which allows easily interact with them.


The MDC uses the plants as a catalyst for nearly any imbalance that occurs in the aquarium. Because there are so many variables involved, ranging from water quality, the combination of plants, fish, light, among others, I will try to standardize certain requirements without which it becomes difficult to maintain a healthy aquarium.

In this sense, this method assumes a light of at least 4 watts per gallon, CO2 between 25 to 35 ppm, that there are fast-growing plants (with only echinodorus this system does not work).

1. Lighting – Generalities

When I propose to use the gallon/watts rule we are being as inaccurate as we are clear. There are many other ways to calculate lighting, lumens, PAR, etc. I believe that the ‘accuracy’ about light is just a delusion. There are too many variables in play and the subject becomes too difficult to understand. For this reason I am going to propose the watts/gallon rule with some corrective measures in order to look for more accuracy without losing clarity. Overall, it says that the plants require at least 2 watts/gallon and in fact this should be read as it is the bare minimum to survive and grow for low requirements plants. However, our goal is a bit more ambitious because I want to induce a metabolism working at a 100% rate, which is why we recommend 4 watts/gallon as a minimum. However, the feedback from the last two years has emerged to show that many people have successfully used this system with less illuminated aquariums (as low as 3 watts/gallon). At any rate we recommend to improve the lighting to 4 watts per gallon – this being the minimum I recommend.

As I anticipated, this rule has some simple corrections:
a) The watts/gallon rule only works in aquariums up to 18 inches high. To set the height of the tank, measure the height of the aquarium glass (raw height) and not the clear height (height of the water column). TLD common tubes (Normal Output linear fluorescent tubes) have little penetration in the water, if we don’t use this correction we can make the mistake of believing we have proper light with a deep aquarium. In cases of deep tanks, then we recommend the use of HQI.
b) In the front of the aquarium you should use PLLs (compact fluorescent/power compact) in order to provide proper light to plants on the bottom like glossostigma elatinoides, echinodorus tenellus, etc. The advantage about PLL is that you have twice or three times more light in the same space and better penetration.
c) The third correction is about light quality. We usually recommend the use of, from the back to the front, GroLux, 842 (80 CRI, 4200K PLL), 954 (90 CRI, 5400K PLL). The meadow plants (glosso, HC, etc.) requires quantity instead of light quality. For this reason you can use 865 (80 CRI, 6500K PLL) instead of 954 or HQI as an option.

2. Water quality

Initially, the MCI didn’t have this chapter but from the feedback there came the need to give this subject its own space. I never underestimate its importance but I was aware of the enormous variety of chemical composition that we have throughout the world and I preferred not to generalize. The feedback has allowed me to identify specific problem cases which I will describe briefly in this chapter.

a. One of the most frequent issues is related to overpopulation. Excess of fish, shrimp or melanoides may produce enough ammonia to produce Green Thread Algae. In this case, the tests may have a false negative, they aren’t reliable because they read only the ammonia that algae didn’t uptake.
It is essential to reduce the population – less is better. Sometimes, increasing the biological filtration helps in the long term. The use of zeolite is the best option. Usually this is commercialized as an ammonia remover to add to the filter. There are other products that produce the same effect.

b. From the feedback and my own experience when I was in Annapolis, I discovered that usually the ammonia comes with the tap water. To test the tap water before every water change is a good idea when the aquarium is still ‘young’ and without enough plants.

c. There are some places where the tap water is hard and with a natural imbalance related to Ca carbonate. In this cases we are going to deal with too problems. A high KH interferences with CO2 dissolution. And too much Ca produces a fertile environment for specific red algae (BBA) (see the algae chapter). An obvious solution is to use 50% of RO or distilled water/50% tap water with the water change.

d. Pollution is an issue and it is not going to get better. Many areas of Mexico, Brazil and Buenos Aires state (Argentina) have problems with levels of NO3 over 45 ppm in the tap water. A good quality water shouldn’t have more than 10 ppm. If your water has this problem there are some different options. The most obvious is to use R.O. water. A second option is to use rain water and to blend it with the tap water.
A third option, if you have enough space, is to have a water reservoir with emerged Scindapsus aureus (Devil’s Ivy, Pothos).

The basis of the MCI is the use of KNO3 Protocol. In those cases above we can’t do it. Potassium sulfate is an option. Potassium carbonate or bicarbonate is another. However, we shouldn’t forget the usual recommendation about how much to add. If the use of only KNO3 is stable, then we should use this rule. The NPK ratio in the KNO3 is 1/0/0.5. So, if we have 40 ppm of NO3, we should add half of this amount of K, it means 20 ppm.

e. The tap water may also contain an excess of PO4. This happens when the water department filters the water and they add polyphosphates to protect the filters and pipes from corrosion. This is often done when the water is very soft, comes from the sea or it naturally contains some kind of poison, like arsenic, in low levels. This is the case of the tap water in NYC. It contains 3 ppm of PO4. The best route is to use R.O. water in these cases, but even R.O. water is complicated. If you chose plants properly you can easily have a stable aquarium with high PO4 levels. If you have a meadow of marsilea crenata and tap water comes with 3 ppm of PO4, then you probably will have enough PO4 to feed them. If you have some GSA already, then you should add a little bit of extra PO4, I will explain it properly and in more detail in the fertilizing chapter. I had an aquarium with a meadow of marsilea crenata and they uptake 4 to 5 ppm of PO4 weekly. Anubias, microsorums and crypts are a good choice too.

f. Sometimes your water is really complicated. You can have an imbalance related to Ca and PO4 at the same time. GDA will be an issue and the EI theory about it just doesn’t work. I will explain in the algae control chapter how to deal with this issue.

3. CO2

There is no need to explain how important CO2 is, so I will deal only with the problematic topic.

There are charts to establish the level of CO2 in water that uses pH and KH. PPS recommends it. It’s a mistake. The accuracy is so low that the pH/KH charts are useless, in fact, they are an obstacle. In my personal experience, these charts are useful only to help a beginner to understand that he has no enough CO2 only when the lack is humongous.
In fact, the main problem with these sorts of charts is that you may think that you have enough CO2 when you don’t.

The drop checkers have the same problem.
Electronic devices aren’t magic; if we calibrate them improperly the CO2 will be low. Devices like the Milwaukee uses pH to stop CO2 injection. The easiest way to calibrate it is using the pH/KH chart but this is a mistake.

I used laboratory quality (not standard aquarium brands) CO2 test and I compare it to the charts and shrimp behavior. According with the charts my aquarium had 90 ppm of CO2 but fish and shrimp were perfect. But CO2 test reads 25 ppm.

I believe that the best option is to use shrimp as a bio-indicator. I propose shrimp because they are more sensitive than fish. At real 40 ppm of CO2 they start behaving weird: they do uncontrollable movements, they try to escape. So, the procedure I propose is to spend one morning watching what is going on with the aquarium and every 30 minutes to increase a little bit the CO2 until the shrimp get upset. Then we turn on the air pump or any devices to oxygenate the water and we calibrate the CO2 with the 30 minutes previous dose. This is the real limit of CO2 your plants can uptake without risking your fish.

If you have an aquarium with shrimp, then I suggest that when you reach the limit, you calibrate the CO2 with the 90 minutes previous dose and you compensate this range with Flourish Excel.

For example, you add 1 bubble per second, after 30 minutes you increase it to 2 bubbles per second and so on. When you add 4 bubbles per second and the shrimp begin to behave weird. Then you oxygenate the water and calibrate the CO2 to 3 bubbles per second.
If you are using a Milwaukee, you calibrate the pH a little bit higher.

However, there is a false positive. If you have discus and the have parasites in their gills they will be breathing at the surface even with low levels of CO2. The damage that the parasites produce in their gills is permanent but you can make sure that the damage get worst by proper CO2 regulation.

Some tips from feedback:
– The distribution of the CO2 through out the tank is as important as its dissolution in water.
– The crystal CO2 diffuser needs of a small power head to distribute the micro bubbles.
– The CO2 should pass by the prop of the powerhead instead of the venturi.
– The crystal CO2 diffuser usually works better in small aquariums.
– If your nano diffuser is too small for the smallest powerhead, you can tune it in order to reduce the water flow like this:

In medium and big tanks we should use a system like this one connected to a strong 500 gallon/h power head:


Changing 50% of the water weekly helps a lot to prevent algae.

IV. Fertilizing approach of the MCI

The MCI is a fertilizing and algae control method. It was developed as an algae control method, so its potential about fertilizing was obvious. Other fertilizing methods just pretend that algae doesn’t exist and they don’t take any responsibility about them. I believe that algae and fertilizing are two faces of the same coin. Algae gives us feedback about how are we doing with the water management in our aquariums. If there is something wrong they bloom. No matter which fertilizing method you are using, as soon as you have some experience you develop your own method even if you don’t realize it. But sometimes there are recurrent issues you can’t solve; this is a feedback you should listen to. Sometimes you are the problem; sometimes the problem is that you are using a bad theory. What I mean by bad theory is an idea that doesn’t work and because of that it should be abandoned instead of inventing pseudo scientific explanation when this is still not working. GDA is the best example. Even thou there is a very nice explanation about the cycle of living for this algae, the solution proposed (waiting) is…how to say it…a confession that the author has no idea about how to deal with it. But this is not the proper chapter to explain this so let’s deal with the fertilizing. I don’t mean that the complete method should be abandoned; only those ideas that are wrong. You can use any method if you tune it, replacing the bad concepts that ruin it.

1. Generalities

About micros and Fe, if you add 3 times more than what your plants are uptaking you will have issues with red algae (BBA) is we assume that your tank fulfills the prerequisites I described earlier.

About calcium chloride, even small dose may burn microsorum leaves. For this reason I don’t recommend to use it.

The base of the MCI is the fertilizing with KNO3, not only KNO3, this is just a beginning. To begin the KNO3 Protocol I recommend for beginners 1 gram every 50 gallons per week. The idea is to look for the real uptake of your tank; we are going to use the generic KNO3 protocol for this. It consists of adding this dose every day until you reach Green Spot Algae (GSA). Then, the total amount of KNO3 you added is the weekly amount of KNO3 you are going to use in the future in order to have a water chemistry close to GSA.

About phosphate, as a beginning, I recommend not to use it right now. However, the dose I will use for the PO4 Protocol is 1 gram every 500 gallons.

About dosing, the electronic scales are so cheap in the States that I don’t find any excuse to avoid buying one.

b. Preliminary clarification

When we talk about weekly dose, you should add it every day. If you can’t, at least divide it in three and dose 3 times per week. This is OK.

If I don’t specify it, I always mean weekly dose.

Use the Fertilator for adding iron and PO4!!!!

If you have HQI, then the KNO3 weekly uptake is 4 times higher. The starting dosing should be 4 gram every 50 gallons if you have enough plants.

2. Advanced fertilizing

a) KNO3 and PO4

The generic protocol of KNO3 will be the main tool for algae control. We are going to use it for finding out the real uptake of NO3 in your aquarium.

The generic KNO3 protocol:

1. First day 50% water change.
2. Stop fertilizing.
3. Add daily 1 gram of KNO3 every 50 gallons until GSA appears.
4. As soon as you reach it or on the seventh day do a 50% water change.
5. If GSA didn’t bloom the first week then after the water change, add double the amount (2 grams per 50 gallons) of KNO3 during this week.

In the fertilizing approach, this protocol works like this:
You add KNO3 every day; let’s suppose you reach GSA the 3rd day in a 50 gallon tank. Then the weekly dose of KNO3 will be 3 grams divided in seven days.

If your aquarium is really healthy, the remaining amount of KNO3 in the water should be low. If the NO3 raises, this means that you are having problems related to CO2, KH, lack of light, overpopulation, bad tap water quality, lack of plants, etc. In these cases you should check the prerequisites out.

About PO4, you should be asking why I ‘restrict’ PO4. Well, a healthy aquarium has a normal tendency to lack NO3 and for excess of PO4. For this reason I suggest to listen to your aquarium and to add PO4 only if you need it. Green Spot Algae and pigmy leaf and symptoms of a real lack of PO4. On the other hand, we know that microsorums, anubias and marsilea crenata consumes a lot of PO4; in these cases we know we may need to add it.

I would like to clarify this subject. If we add more PO4 it doesn’t mean that plants will uptake more. If we are adding too much we are confessing that we have no idea how much we need. I look for efficiency.

I know you all probably think I am limiting resources but I believe that this concept from Hydroponic cannot be used without any tune up in submersed crops. The reason is simple, we are not only dealing with plant grow rate we have to deal with algae, too. So the idea behind the MCI is not to limit anything, instead I am looking for efficiency, which is the target. I made a living out of cultivating submersed aquarium plants and I had great growth rate with zero algae. Algae for me meant bankruptcy, plain and simple.

In fact, I am limiting some resources but not PO4; I limit potassium (K). I don’t want NO3 to reach zero, if we add too much K we can achieve this anti goal. It is better to supply K from the KNO3 and KH2PO4 you add and not from KHSO4.

The main idea is that there are plants with priority consumptions. With this concept I mean that only some plants uptake a lot of a specific macro and these plants will define the fertilizing.

If we need to add PO4 because we have some plants that demand it we have two choices:

1. There may not be evidence (GSA for example) of a lack of PO4. This happens when we have plants with priority consumption but not enough to significantly alter the water chemistry. In this case we can add a little bit of PO4 over the leaves with a syringe without needle. The dose may be insignificant in ppms but enough if we take care about the uptaking of that plant, then it can be more than enough.
2. The second scenario is when we actually have GSA after we stop adding KNO3. In that case we should use the PO4 protocol to find out the real uptake rate of this macro. The PO4 protocol (Algae control approach: against GSA) (Fertilizing approach: PO4 consuming finder) is the following:

The Po4 protocol is:

1. First day 50% water change.
2. Stop fertilizing.
3. Clean the glass of GSA daily.
4. Add daily 1 gram of PO4 every 500 gallons until GSA stops appearing/blooming.
5. As soon as you reach this point or on the seventh day do a 50% water change.
6. If GSA didn’t stop blooming the first week, after the water change add double the amount of PO4 during the second week and so on.

Once we reach the point where GSA stops blooming, then we use this weekly amount of PO4 as the weekly fertilizing of PO4. If it took three weeks to find out this point, you only use the last week’s amount; you don’t add the 3 week’s amount.

b) Ca and Mg

The 4:1 ratio Ca:Mg cannot be successfully used in the planted aquarium. When there is too much PO4 in the water and you have an imbalance in the Ca:Mg ratio, you will have GDA. In my experience, if you add these macros, the ratio should be the opposite 1:4 Ca:Mg. The immediate consequence of this idea is that you can’t add too much Ca because Mg cannot be added in large amounts.
We can find out how much Ca:Mg we need in the same way I propose to do it with NO3 and PO4. However, I suggest you better wait a little more if you are a beginner.

The Mg protocol is:

1. First day 50% water change.
2. Stop fertilizing.
3. Add 0.3 ppm of Ca daily until the algae “.3. RODOPHYTAS SP. 3” blooms.
4. Then use the specific protocol for this alga you will find in the algae control chapter.

With these simple steps you will know how much Mg you need. About Ca, just add 25% of the Mg.

This is not necessary to reach this algae, rotalla wallichi can also be use as a bio-indicator because it melts when there is too much Mg.

Rotala Macranta is a Ca priority consumer plant, so it will alter the Ca consumption of the aquarium. We can assert the same about ammania gracilis, if these plants get blackish that is a symptom of lack of Ca.

The Ca:Mg ratio I suggest is a generalization. Priority consumer plants always alter this kind of rules; but using the steps I mentioned and the algae as bio-indicators, as the blind man with his cane, you can find the balance of your aquarium.

I don’t like to use calcium chloride because it can burn microsorum leaves. Usually with water changes you add enough Ca. Another option, if you have soft water with low KH is to use aragonite in your filter. It should be enough for standard requirements plants.

You know when you have an imbalance related to Ca because you will have rodophyta algae sp.2 (look for the picture at the algae control chapter) or, if you also have at the same time an imbalance related to PO4, then you will have an issue with GDA.

c) Potassium

One of the special features of the MCI is that I don’t recommend the use of potassium sulfate (KHSO4). There are some reasons. The first one is that if you add this macro, the NO3 will be uptaken and as soon as you reach zero you will have algae issues. The main goal I think is to avoid this situation. The idea behind the MCI is to have a stable water chemistry where we know we are always close to GSA. If we add K this stability disappears.

On the other hand, it is better to do not add sulfur when we can avoid it. Bacteria oxidation may produce sulfuric acid. Of course, if you add a lot of Fe you alter the redox ratio and this problem is neutralized but it is simpler just to limit the addition of sulfur.

If you have hard water, you probably already have more that enough sulfur and adding more with the fertilizing may produce Grey Hair Algae (See algae control chapter).

K is needed, no doubt, but in my experience, with the low K we add with KNO3 is more that enough. If my assumption is wrong, then microsrums pteropus should became black.

Hygrophila polisperma is a plant that consumes priority K. I have read that it is propose to be use as a bio-indicator of the lack of K. This is a mistake; the uptaking of K with this plant in your aquarium becomes bulky. You can put this plant just with water and potassium sulfate and it will grow well.

d) Ca, K and Sodium carbonates

There is a difficult solution issue about adding carbonate to the water of a planted aquarium. It is almost an intuitive assumption to add potassium or calcium carbonate or bicarbonate. However, we should take attention to the total amount of K we are adding to the water. If we add potassium phosphate, potassium nitrate and carbonate or bicarbonate, we can easily be adding like 50 ppm of K. If we also add potassium sulfate, then the amount of K is too high. K by itself is not an issue like iron that can become poisonous in high doses but it can result in the NO3 reaching zero and that would be a problem.

If we don’t want to add so much potassium sulfate, then the solution is to combine Calcium, sodium and potassium carbonates/bicarbonates in order to keep all of them in acceptable rates.

As I already explain in the Ca/Mg chapter, we should be careful with the amount of Ca we add if we don’t want to have issues with red algae or GDA. On the other hand, Discus an Apistos are sensitive to Ca.

The reason for adding carbonates to the water is related to avoid a breakdown of the buffer that allows the pH to fall to low.
I was born in Buenos Aires City, in Argentina. We live in just besides the De La Plata River which begins in the Mato Groso swamps in Brazil. The tap water has a 1.5 KH and barely any Ca. I never had problems with this myth about the breakdown of the buffer. Even the pH can fall; this is not a never ending fall. Only fish from hard water and high pH have serious problems. Botia macracanta is one of them.

I am not suggesting to have a 5.5 pH with our fish; I am just trying to explain that this is not such a big deal.

We have this very soft water and hobbyists have successfully been using aragonite for decades to avoid this buffer breakdown. Aragonite, coral sand, is thicker than the standard calcium carbonate we can buy. The advantage of this is that the water won’t become white and as soon as its low water dissolving properties, the Co2, will dissolve it slowly when this is needed and no more. We only need a small amount of aragonite in our filter.

e) Fe

The MCI works with only 0.1 ppm of Fe per week.

The PPS and the EI uses higher levels of Fe. Fe reduces the redox potential and it could be useful if you have too much sulfur in your water or it is polluted. On the other hand, if you have both, Po4 and Fe high, they will become iron phosphate.

There is a lot of debate about if plants can uptake it or not. It doesn’t make any difference. You can know how much Fe your plants uptake if you are adding like 0.025ppm a day until you get algae. I believe that this is not necessary, but you can do it if you feel like. The algae that will bloom for Iron can be stopped with the KNO3 generic protocol but you will need glutaraldehyde (Flourish Excel) to eliminate them.

Excess of Fe:

Ca + Fe:

However, I believe that the best approach is to add PO4 and Fe on alternating days. In my experience, 0.1 ppm of Fe is enough. Anyway, your plants will tell you if you really need more.

I know that it is a fact that you can have higher levels of Fe in your tanks with no algae, but I also know that this is less stable and there is no need for that. Plants will not start starving if you add Fe in a more efficient, conservative way.

It is all about focus, don’t mix method. You can add less Fe only if you add less PO4. As I explained before, it is all about imbalances instead of lack or excess.


In this chapter I will describe the protocols (steps) I have successfully used to imbalance the aquarium looking for GSA as a first step, and looking for a final balance later with no algae at all.

A. Green algae

A.1. Green Water

It is not very clear why this algae blooms. In my personal experience, it always blooms when the KNO3 and PO4 levels where to high together. However, it seems that this is not the only situation where it can bloom. GWA also is common in new aquariums, we can speculate that nitrite may also be a nutrient that this algae uses. Water changes don’t solve anything, usually it is worse. To avoid GW it is best to start a new aquarium with a lot of fast growing plants, not necessarily the definitive you want to have.

You can solve it using for time the dose of Tetra Baktozym.
An UV filter is the best option. Make a 50% water change before you start using it and on the 7th day. Stop fertilizing.

A.2. Green Algae (CHLOROPHITAS)

Green Thread Algae

This alga is related to ammonia. Please read about it at the water quality chapter in order to identify why you have ammonia in your aquarium.

1. First day, 50% water change. Check that the water you are adding is ammonia free.
2. Don’t decrease the light.
3. Check the Co2 level, don’t assume it is ok.
4. Apply just over the algae with syringe without needle 10 ml/25 gallon of hydrogen peroxide or glutaraldehyde /Flourish Excel is a good option. However, this product only solves the symptom.
5. Stop fertilizing.
6. 50% water change at the 7th day.
If you have enough shrimp they can easily clean this algae but they don’t solve the imbalance that caused it. 4 shrimp per gallon can clean a tank in two days. This is an easy solution if you already have them or if they are cheap. Where I live a bag with 200 of them cost like 2 dollars, they are used as live food.

A.3. Sp. Short Green Algae

I had this algae between having sold my old canister and receiving the new one. The aquarium has a lot of echinodorus and just a few fast growing plants. As soon as the new filter had been working for a week and I add more plants, this algae disappeared.

A.4. Green Spot Algae (GSA)

GSA is related to an imbalance between PO4 and NO3. Essentially there is no PO4.

1. First day 50% water change.
2. Keep adding KNO3.
3. Clean the glass of GSA daily.
4. Add daily 1 gram of PO4 every 500 gallons until GSA stops appears.
5. As soon as you reach this point or on the seventh day do a 50% water change.
6. If GSA didn’t stop blooming/appearing the first week, after the water change add double the amount of KNO3 during the second week and so on.


This algae is related to an imbalance between light and CO2.
You should check that the CO2 is enough. Read the CO2 chapter to find out how to reach the maximum you can add without risking your fauna. If there is no way to add more CO2, then you should decrease the light. This is unusual and only happens when you use natural light in summer time.

You can use Flourish Excel to kill this algae, 4 times the recommended dose.
If you have a shrimp tank and you don’t want to risk them by adding more CO2, you should compensate it by using Flourish Excel nd CO2.
Riccia, egeria densa and hemianthus micrantemoides suffer a lot with an Excel overdose.

1. Check CO2 level.
2. Use the KNO3 generic protocol
3. Add 4 times the recommended dose of Flourish Excel


Cyanobacteria (BGA) is related to an imbalance between NO3 and PO4. Always means that there is too much PO4, it can also happen because there isn’t enough NO3.

If you have discus the issue probably is too much PO4.
If the aquarium has a meadow or glossostigma elatinoides then the problem probably is the lack of NO3.

Cyanobacteria can be eradicated in the same way as bacteria. You can add just over the algae with a syringe without needle 10 ml/25 gallon of hydrogen peroxide once a day. Erythromycin can be use only when you have too much cyanobacteria. Be careful with BGA as it is a hepato-toxin (liver) and can make you ill.

Small amounts of cyanobacteria are probably caused because of a lack of NO3. This usually happens when you have glossostigma elatinoides or a lot of fast growing plants.
1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol.
2. Vacuum up the cyanobacteria or use the hydrogen peroxide.

1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol but adding double the amount of Kno3.
2. Black out the tank for 3 days.
3. After the 3 days, start again with the KNO3 generic protocol using the standard amount of KNO3 until you reach GSA.

1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol but adding double the amount of KNO3.
2. Black out the tank for 3 days.
3. Add 500 mg of erythromycin every 25 gallons once a day.
4. After the 3 days, start again with the KNO3 generic protocol using the standard amount of KNO3 until you reach GSA.


There is a lot of confusion about this algae. The EI method suggests that you should wait out the lifecycle of this algae until it dies (about 3 weeks).
However, a friend of mine waited for 6 months, the picture is from his tank.
I tested the water and I discovered a complex imbalance related to (1) Ca: Mg, too much Ca and (2) NO3:PO4, too much PO4. Three days later after we worked out and corrected these imbalances the problem was solved.

1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol plus:
2. Clean the glasses every day until GDA doesn’t appears anymore.
3. In future, you should use a Ca:Mg ratio of 1:4.
4. If you add PO4, read the fertilizing chapter about PO4.
5. Read the water quality chapter about excess of PO4 and Ca in tap water.


This algae is related to an excess of Fe.
1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol plus:
2. Add just over the algae with syringe without needle 10 ml/25 gallon of hydrogen peroxide once a day. Excel can be used too, 4 times the recommended dose.
3. In future, you should add 1/3 of the Fe you were using.


This algae is related to a complex imbalance where there is too much Ca in relation to Mg and there is an excess of Fe too.

1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol plus:
2. add just over the algae with syringe without needle 10 ml/25 gallon of hydrogen peroxide once a day. Excel can be used too, 4 times the recommended dose.
3. In future, you should add 1/3 of the Fe you were using.
4. In future, change the Ca:Mg ratio. Please read the fertilizing chapter about Ca:Mg.


This algae is related to an imbalance between Ca: Mg where there is too much Mg. If you have marble in you tank, you should remove it

1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol plus:
2. In future, reduce the amount of Mg you are adding.


I don’t know exactly why this algae blooms. I had it when I cut too many plants or when I put too much aragonite in the filter.

– The Kno3 generic protocol stops the bloom.
– WC helps a lot.
– This is H3O proof algae.
– Shrimp are useful only if you have too many of them.
– You need Excell to eliminate it.


This algae is related to an imbalance between NO3:PO4 where there is an excess of PO4 and lack of CO2.

1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol plus:
2. Check KH, eventually, reduce KH using RO water.
3. Check CO2. Read the chapter about CO2.
4. Stop adding PO4; read about PO4 at the fertilizing chapter.


An imbalance related to Ca and lack of Co2 is related to this algae.

1. Use the Kno3 generic protocol plus:
2. Reduce Fe in future, 1/3 of what was being used should be enough. I suggest 0.1 ppm.
3. Use Flourish Excel to kill this algae by spot treating affected areas.
4. Check Co2, uso the shrimp protocol.
5. Check Ca:Mg ratio
6. Check Kh, it may interference the Co2 dissolution

E. DIATOMS aka Brown Algae

1. Increase your light!!!!!! Don’t waste you time about silicates.
2. Otocinculus will take care of this quickly
This algae will sometimes show in newly setup aquariums.


This algae is related to an excess of sulfur. It usually happens when your tap water already contains too much sulfur and you use potassium or magnesium sulfate.

1. Use the KNO3 generic protocol plus:
2. Try to get a water analysis from the Water company.
3. Reduce or eliminate the use of sulfates (potassium, Mg, etc)

G. Different algae at the same time

You should chose the worst and start working about it. Cyanobacteria (BGA) are the worst always because it kills plants. If you reach GSA this water chemistry will help you to start finding a long term balance.



* Artículo original en español

CO2 casero (mi método)

Autor del artículo: Jordi Maldonado

Artículo original y comentarios: CO2 casero (mi método) – Foro Acuario Rosa

Esta es una explicación de cómo hago yo mi propia mezcla de co2 para mi acuario de 54 litros. Ni es la única ni seguramente es la mejor, pero para quien comienza a aditar co2 casero creo que es ideal por su senillez y su efectividad. Yo estuve mucho tiempo sin abonar con co2 por miedo a meter la pata, y al final he descubierto que es casi necesario hacerlo, así que espero que no haya nadie que no lo pruebe.

Materiales para preparar la mezcla.

* Una botella de litro de cocacola. Imprescindible que sea de refresco carbonatado, porque el tapón está preparado para aguantar presiones.
* Un sistema de gotero, que se encuentra en las farmacias. Hay varios modelos y fabricantes. Lo que necesitamos es el conjunto que lleva la goma y el cuenta gotas. Para que os hagais una idea, es lo que se pincha en la bolsa de suero y se conecta a la vía. El precio es de 60 cent.
* Algo de silicona, aunque no es imprescindible (yo no la tengo puesta)
* Boquillas de cigarro. En los estancos venden los filtros sueltos y cuestan un euro aproximadamente, la bolsa es de 100 unidades, con lo cual tenemos para varios meses.
* Agua caliente. Sirve la que sale del grifo de agua caliente… no es necesario calentarla ni con el microondas ni con el cazo.
* Levadura natural. La venden los supermercados y panaderias. En Mercadona, por ejemplo, tienen una muy bien de precio en la sección de matequillas. Necesita conservarse en el frigo y caduca rapidamente, por eso ése envase pequeño viene genial.
* Azucar. No hace falta dar más explicaciones… creo que todo el mundo sabe lo que es y donde se encuentra.

El primer paso es preparar la botella. La lavamos bien, y en el tapón hacemos un agujero con cualquier cuchillo de punta, por el que meteremos el pincho del sistema de gotero. Tal y como lo pincharíamos en la bolsa de suero. Para que quede sellado, podemos poner silicona por dentro y por fuera, pero si entra bien apretado, no es necesario.

Detalle del equipo de gotero pinchado en el tapón de la botella

En el otro extremo de la goma del gotero, metemos a presión un filtro de cigarro. Si tenemos filtros gordos, quitamos un poco de celulosa y lo metemos a presión.

Aquí está el filtro metido a presión en la goma, por el extremo que va al acuario…

La mezcla:
Ahora, con agua del grifo bien caliente llenamos un tercio de la botella.

Según mi calentador, el agua caliente sale a 57º

Añadimos un vaso lleno de azucar y tapando la boca de la botella con la palma de la mano, movemos energicamente la mezcla para que el azucar se disuelva por completo en el agua caliente.

Agua claiente y azucar bien mezclada

En un vaso con un par de dedos de agua templada, o sea la que sale del grifo, metemos un tercio de pastilla de levadura y lo disolvemos con los dedos hasta que no queden grumos.

Un tercio de pastilla de levadura (el tercio que falta lo usé la semana pasada)

Disolviendo la levadura con los dedos

Con la ayuda de un colador, lo metemos en la botella.

Acabamos de llenar la botella con agua del grifo templada dejando vacios tres dedos de la botella. Enroscamos la botella al tapón y dejamos la válvula del cuenta gotas abierta.

Mezcla preparada. En unas horas empezará a echar burbujitas…

Para llenar el cuentagotas de agua y poder ver la velocidad con la que salen las botellas, yo con la válvula cerrada para que la mezcla no pase al otro extremo, aprieto la botella e inyecto parte de esa mezcla… pero si tienes mano y sabes hacerlo de otra manera, perfecto.

A partir de aquí, es cuestión de meter el extremo con el filtro del cigarro dentro del acuario y esperar a que en unas horas, la mezcla haga reacción.

El funcionamiento es bastante sencillo, la levadura se alimenta del azucar, y desprende CO2 que al ser un gas y ocupar espacio, tiene que salir de la botella. Como el tapón está cerrado y aguanta presiones, el gas sólo encuentra el camino del cuenta gotas para salir, pasa por éste, dejando ver la burbuja, y llega al otro extremo, donde al pasar por el filtro de cigarro, se rompe en miles de miniburbujas. estas burbujas se mezclan con el agua del acuario y le inyectan el co2 mientras buscan la superficie del agua.


1.- La botella debe estar de pie, y por debajo del plano del acuario, para que en caso de caida, la mezcla nunca llegua a entrar dentro del acuario. Es una cuestión física, ningún líquido sube hacia arriba si no es mediante succión o con una bomba…

2.- La cantidad de azucar disuelta en el agua nos dará la duración de la mezcla. A más concentración de azucar, mayor duración. Para disolver el azucar, es imprescindible hacerlo con agua caliente.

3.- La cantidad de levadura, nos dará la velocidad. A más levadura, más burbujas por segundo. Para disolver la levadura, siempre se utiliza agua templada, ya que el calor mata la levadura y pierde eficacia.

4.- El ritmo varía. El primer día tendremos más burbujas por segundo que a la semana siguiente. Como éste cambio en la inyección de co2 nos desequilibraría las condiciones del acuario, yo recomiendo hacer una mezcla por semana, ya que el gasto que supone rellenar la botella es mínimo y los beneficios de una inyección constante son enormes.

5.- Si el acuario es mediano/grande, lo ideal es hacer una bateria en paralelo de botellas. En mi caso tengo dos, cada uno con su gotero, y un aplique en forma de T (que se puede comprar por 50 centimos en una tienda de acuarios) a continuación de los mismos, juntando las burbujas que salen de los dos. Cada semana cambio una botella, y así siempre tengo la misma frecuencia de salida de burbujas. El cambio que he notado es considerable. Tened en cuenta que si abonamos a trompicones, las algas (que son más rápidas que las plantas) se dispararían.

Mi bateria de botellas. La pieza en forma de T junta los goteros para inyectarlo al acuario en un solo tubo.

6.- Al no tener electroválvula para cerrar el co2, se abona 24h al día. Es preferible eso, a cerrar el gotero por las noches, porque en ese caso no dejamos de generar co2 dentro de la botella, y la presión haría saltar el sistema (normalmente por la unión del gotero con el tapón). Además, en caso de no saltar el sistema, al abrirlo por la mañana, todo ese gas acumulado se metería de golpe al acuario y sería contraproducente. No pasa nada por abonar 24h al día. No es lo ideal, pero no veo que pase nada malo

Tiburones mascota

Luis Leyva se ofreció muy amablemente a compartir el siguiente artículo con los lectores de Acuario Rosa.

Luis es autor de la página Tiburonpedia, y se ofreció tambien a contestar a algunas de mis preguntas sobre este maravilloso pez.

Tiburones mascota

Artículo de Luis Leyva
Publicación original: Tiburones mascota

Un tiburon puede ser algo que nunca se considere como un animal que la gente deba tener como mascota, pero el hecho es, que diferentes tipos de tiburones se mantienen en acuarios domésticos en todo el mundo.

Los tiburones de acuarios de agua salada, por lo general son los tiburones pequeños, como los tiburones de arrecife. Hay también un número de peces de agua dulce populares que se conocen como tiburones “mascotas” de agua dulce. Estas especies no son verdaderos tiburones , y ni siquiera se relaciónan con los tiburones. Sin embargo, hay “verdaderos” tiburones de agua dulce, aunque son raros y no fácilmente disponibles en el comercio de acuarios.

Se podría pensar que sería peligroso mantener a tiburones como animales de compañía, el peligro que estos presentan es real. Los tiburones que son comúnmente conservados como mascotas, no son una amenaza para la vida de un adulto, pero pueden hacer heridas desagradables que pueden resultar en cicatrices si te muerden. Sin embargo, hay una larga lista de otros habitantes del acuario populares, que son potencialmente más peligrosas, como el pez león.

Los tiburones como mascotas son, sin embargo, las especies más adecuadas para acuarios enormes. Esta es la razón por la que la mayoría de las personas hace su investigación antes de comprar un tiburón para su pequeña casa de acuario. Muchas de estas especies crecen muy grandes, y no son adecuados para los acuarios,y más en casa. La mayoría de las especies de tiburones necesitarán un acuario o estanque del tamaño de una piscina cuando crezcan grandes, por lo que la mayoría de los aficionados deben evitar estos pecesen general. Nunca se debe tener un tiburón si no se les puede ofrecer este tipo de acuario para tiburones.

Hay un número de tiburones que se venden como mascotas, pero las especies más comunes son:

Algunas de estas especies pueden crecer hasta 4 m / 13 pies de largo,lo que hace que sea fácil tenerlos como mascotas para la mayoría de los aficionados. Otro tiburón que se pueden encontrar en tiendas de acuarios de vez en cuando es el tiburón toro, el cual  es especialmente inadecuado para mantener en acuarios, ya que son unos de los tiburones más agresivos que existen.El tiburón toro se puede encontrar en agua dulce, pero no deben mantenerse como un pez de agua dulce.

vea ademas:

Tiburones en cautiverio

Tiburones en la cultura

Entrevista a Luis Leyva

¿A qué se debe tu interés por los tiburones?

Desde niño tengo gran interés en estos peces, me imagino que será por
la forma que tienen, elegantes, alfas, aerodinámicos, aparte de ser
peces muy peligrosos, no quita que sean animales muy hermosos.
De grande soy un gran admirador de la naturaleza en general, pero sigo
teniendo especial interés en los tiburones, no le hayo ninguna razón
especifica, solo los encuentro interesantes e incomprendidos por la
mayoría de las personas, me gustaría que existiera mas información ,
sobre estos animales, no información especifica de cada especie, sino
información general de ellos y sobre todo su interacción con los seres

¿Qué opinas de los tiburones que se mantienen en acuarios públicos?

Existen muchas especies de estos peces que están en peligro de
extinción, mantenerlos en acuarios, puede tener varias ventajas,
aprender más sobre ellos, sus comportamientos, como se comunican, como
se reproducen, y otras temáticas sobre ellos que no están totalmente
claras para los científicos actualmente. Mantenerlos en acuarios
públicos además puede ayudar a las personas a conocerlos mejor, saber
la verdad sobre ellos y de esta forma cuidarlos mas .Hay veces que
para ayudar a un tiburón es necesario tenerlo en acuarios, aunque sea
algo provisional, hasta que el animal se recupere.


 ¿Cuál es tu tiburón preferido y por qué?

No tengo un tiburón preferido, en su anatomía , su forma , prefiero al
tiburón Gris, tiene a mi parecer, la aerodinámica mas bonita , los
tiburones blancos tienen una excelente visión a color bajo del agua ,
el tiburón ballena es el pez mas grande existente , el tiburón cabeza
de martillo puede detectar el latido de un pez 100 veces menor a mas
de un metro de distancia , el tiburón zorro tiene la cola del mismo
tamaño que su cuerpo, creo que si me unen todas estas características
en un solo tiburón tendría un tiburón preferido.

¿La acción del hombre está perjudicando la especie?

Irónicamente, los seres humanos continúan avanzando en el hábitat
natural de los tiburones. Sin embargo, siguen culpando a los tiburones
por la destrucción de embarcaciones, tablas de surf, y entran en
estado de shock cuando se enteran de ataques a seres humanos. Una de
las razones principales por la que pescan al tiburón ha sido
destruirlos. No existe amor entre estas criaturas y el hombre en
muchas áreas. Los tiburones también son cazados por sus aletas. De
hecho, la sopa de aleta de tiburón es un alimento muy común en algunas
partes del mundo, como China. Tiburones extremadamente grandes han
muerto sólo para obtener sus aletas cercenadas, el resto del cuerpo se
deja pudrir en la tierra o es puesto nuevamente en el agua para que
otras criaturas se alimenten.
El consumo de carne de tiburón es común en algunas zonas, se cazan
tiburones para el uso de todo su cuerpo. La carne se utiliza en la
alimentación y la grasa de petróleo. Incluso utilizan la piel para
hacer papel de lija y diversos tipos de herramientas. Todos estos
problemas combinados han dado lugar a una alteración en el mundo de
los tiburones. Debemos recordar que son una parte vital de la cadena

¿Mantienes algún acuario?

Si, mantengo un acuario, aunque no es algo ornamental, tengo varias
especies de peces , lo hago porque soy amante de la vida y en especial
de la vida marina, los colores y contrastes del mundo acuático me
parecen más vivos y atractivos.

Muchísimas gracias Luis

El Paludario, el futuro de la jardinería de interiores

(Artículo de Ángel Febrero para Acuario rosa)

El mantenimiento de plantas de interior tal y como lo conocemos actualmente, en sus recipientes clásicos; jardineras, tiestos etc…. tenderá a desaparecer con el paso del tiempo, al menos esa es nuestra visión, ya que las especies vegetales están de esa manera muy expuestas a condiciones adversas, tales como humedad escasa, temperatura inadecuada…
Por todo ello hemos desarrollado hace más de 12 años el producto Paludario®, que se brinda como la mejor opción de perpetuar, sin apenas mantenimiento, muchas de las plantas de interior más bellas y delicadas, además las mismas están dispuestas en él de una manera natural, como si fuera un fragmento de un paisaje original enmarcado.
La tecnología interior de un Paludario garantiza el correcto funcionamiento del pequeño ecosistema creado, al margen de que su emplazamiento arquitectónico posea la luz, humedad, temperatura y demás factores apropiados para su correcto desarrollo.

El Paludario es un verdadero cuadro vivo en el que sus volúmenes, hojas, musgos y esculturales raíces aéreas “brotan” como certeras pinceladas, fieles al reflejo de una naturaleza salvaje aún diversa y sorprendente en formas y matices, la composición como en cualquier obra pictórica es única e irrepetible e intenta trasmitir la emoción que su creador capta en aquellos parajes y rincones que visita y le acaban cautivando.
La capacidad expresiva del Paludario se ve incrementada gracias al relajante movimiento y sonido del agua, que rezuma y gotea entre sus relieves y musgos

Paludario, es ante todo una marca: (Registro patentes y marcas nº 221.361/3) que garantiza un trabajo de autor y una calidad en sus componentes que lo diferencian del típico acuaterrario o similar, su creador Angel Febrero, cuenta con una dilatada experiencia en el campo del Arte y la Naturaleza.

Paludario a la medida:

Todas nuestras instalaciones estarán realizadas a medida según requerimientos de nuestros clientes.

Manantiales de montaña, pequeños rincones de umbrosos bosques cubiertos de helechos, selvas tropicales y otros variados hábitats que se pueden recrear y enmarcar a la medida en diferentes estilos mobiliarios, además tenemos una solución para recrear grandes espacios con Muros verticales verdes, ideales para grandes edificios.

El Paludario es una instalación interior que requiere para su mayor realce una sala o espacio de luz suave, no aconsejamos la introducción de especies animales en su interior porque podrían deteriorar con el tiempo el equilibrio reinante en su interior.

No obstante también diseñamos ciertos paludarios en los que se pueden introducir sin problemas pequeñas especies de peces, anfibios y otros vertebrados e invertebrados.

Entrevista a Ángel Febrero

Me puse en contacto con Ángel para hablar de los paludarios, donde es una eminencia mundial y no sólo me regaló este artículo y estas impresionantes fotos, sino que me brindó la oportunidad de conocer un poquito más su trabajo.

Hola Ángel, gracias por atenderme.

Me gustaría empezar esta entrevista pidiéndote que hagas una pequeña descripción del trabajo que realizas tú y tu empresa.

Hola Oscar, no queria comenzar la entrevista sin felicitarte por tu web “Acuario Rosa” y por la labor que realizas en ella.

Nosotros, en mi empresa Producciones Artisticas de la Naturaleza SL., venimos desde el 1991 trabajando con el binomio”Arte y Naturaleza”, eso incluye desde: decorados escenograficos y trucajes para documentales de TV y cine, dioramas para museos, replicas de flora y fauna, fotografia expositiva, paisajismo…y como no, nuestra especialidad: los paludarios, de los cuales fui pionero, no solo por registrar la marca PALUDARIO, Registro patentes y marcas nº 221.361/3, si no por intentar desde un principio darle un componente artistico al mismo, huyendo del tipico acuaterrario o similar que existia por entonces.

¿Cómo llegaste vivir de esto?

Pues como te comentaba, en aquellos años nadie, o casi nadie se dedicaba a esas actividades, yo desde siempre era un enamorado de la biologia y complementaba esto con mis estudios en la escuela de arte de Madrid.
Ademas, dada mi ilusión, fue facíl empezar a investigar, prototipar mis primeros paludarios y empezar a exponerlos en exposiciones nacionales, esos trabajos por su estetica y durabilidad se montaron en edificios publicos, museos e incluso particulares.

¿Cuál consideras que fue el proyecto con más dificultades técnicas, el más complejo de los que realizaste hasta ahora?

Pues muchos de los rodajes en TVE para series como “Parques Nacionales”, “La España Salvaje” etc… requerian del maximo esfuerzo creativo a la hora de realizar el decorado y su correspondiente interación con el animal o planta, a demas todo siempre como con mucha prisa y responsabilidad ya que de aquello dependia el trabajo de muchos tecnicos, biologos y demas equipo

¿y el más gratificante?

La verdad, mis primeros paludarios con estetica minimalista a base de musgos, helechos y maderas fosiles, intentando recrear los pequeños manantiales que veia en mis viajes a las montañas asturianas y cantabras…aquello en ese momento era algo que no se conocia y llamaba la atención del publico en mis exposiciones.

En cuanto a los paludarios hechos “por encargo”… ¿Necesitan un “aprendizaje” por parte del encargado de cuidarlo, o los manteneis vosotros, o no tienen ningún cuidado especial?

Claro como todo organismo vivo necesita de un cuidado, aunque sea minimo, esas reglas son algo que doy por escrito al futuro poseedor de un paludario.
Aunque me consta que muchos luego se olvidan y no cumplen con su correcto mantenimiento, por suerte esto es en la minoria de los casos.

¿Cuáles son vuestros mejores clientes en cuanto a paludarios se refieren?

Museos, y organismos publicos, hace poco montamos unos grandes muros verdes con “estetica paludica” para el Ayuntamiento de Madrid (FITUR)

¿Dónde aprendiste todo lo que sabes?

De la propia Naturaleza, observando, experimentando y como no, de muchos artistas y biologos a los que sigo desde que soy un renacuajo.

Para quien quiera montar un paludario… ¿Qué recomendaciones básicas le harías?

Pues que piense muy bien si esa inversión es solo un capricho temporal o esta dispuesto a atenderlo durante muchos años…

¿Qué importancia le das a la parte “acuática” de un paludario?

cada vez más, ya que es todo un conjunto y no se puede olvidar el paisjismo del interior del deposito de agua… para eso aprendo con ilusión de muchos grandes paisajistas como los que aparecen en tu web y alguna otra.

¿Qué significó para ti internet?

Una gran oportunidad de dar a conocer al gran publico nacional e internacional mis creaciones, hace poco he tenido encargos de Suiza, Francia…

Muchísimas gracias por acercarnos un poco más a este fascinante mundo

Igualmente, animo y aseguir con esta maravillosa web.

Podemos leer más sobre el trabajo de Ángel en su página personal:

Cuaderno de campo y taller – Ángel Febrero